SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM Archives

June 2018

SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Pullen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Jun 2018 21:04:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Marcy,

There is a related data element in MSDL - a 15-character identifier for 
the 2525 (or NATO APP-6) unit icon. It is not in the C2SIM Core.

Instead, I expect it will be in the C2SIM Maneuver Warfare Extension 
that the PDG expects to put forward for ballot at the same time as the 
basic C2SIM Standard and the C2SIM Logical Data Model Core Ontology. 
That is because the Core is intended to have only data classes that all 
(or at least most) simulations will need, whereas Maneuver Warfare is 
intended to make sure C2SIM (as extended in MW) has at least the power 
of MSDL plus C-BML, and at the same time provide an exemplar for other 
extension documents.

Mark


On 6/4/18 10:41 AM, Marcy Stutzman wrote:
> Hello C2SIM,
>
> I have a question and believe you are the people who know the answer!  I was wondering if C2SIM incorporates/uses the symbology in:
>
> MIL-STD-2525D, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTERFACE STANDARD JOINT MILITARY SYMBOLOGY
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Marcy Stutzman
> DASN(RDT&E)/NMSO M&S Standards Lead
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM list, click the following link:
> https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2