As I was the submitter, could I have some please review/recommend this CR for approval.

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

***** original message *****

Subject: Re: CR to add Teluk Gilimanuk Class Amphibious Transport Dock Ships
From: David Ronnfeldt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:53:18 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments: Parts/Attachments	 text/plain (34 lines) , CR03772A - CR to add Teluk Gilimanuk Class Amphibious Transport Dock.xlsx (34 lines)


I agree with Flemming's comments, so here is the update.

Rev A - Moved category to 10 - Tank Landing Ship.

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

***** Original Message *****

Subject: Re: CR to add Teluk Gilimanuk Class Amphibious Transport Dock Ships
From: Flemming Joergensen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 04:40:55 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain
Parts/Attachments: Parts/Attachments text/plain (12 lines)

I believe they should have Category 10 Tank Landing Ship. 
As I understand it, Amphibious Transport Dock carries landing crafts, while the Landing Ship unloads troops/tanks directly on a beach.

The pennant numbers and names are fine.

Regards
Flemming Joergensen

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1