Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:22:27 +0000 |
Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
CR03529 still stays on hold.
REV D - Updated to valid link.
As an aside, I know Graham said UK practice is to use Type 26, but Wiki now also references it as City-class frigate. I didn't change it, though, just fixed the link to a valid one. If there's a better UK-based link, feel free to change or add it.
Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710
-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Massey, Charles E
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 1:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: EntityType - Platform - Type 26
Updated CR03529 to REV C. Removed the UUIDs from rows 12 and 13. I don't think these UUIDs caused problems with the ESI Tools, but they caused a bit of manual work with my enumeration sorting tool. Recommend keeping CR03529C in Hold-Future for now.
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1
|
|
|