SAC-SWG-ENUM Archives

February 2018

SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_6A2BF1066E270C42BA099D94E7DB7D00010B8A7240EMPEXMR104cor_"
Date:
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:22:27 +0000
Reply-To:
SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Marrou, Lance R." <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
CR03529 still stays on hold.



REV D - Updated to valid link.



As an aside, I know Graham said UK practice is to use Type 26, but Wiki now also references it as City-class frigate.  I didn't change it, though, just fixed the link to a valid one.  If there's a better UK-based link, feel free to change or add it.



Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]

12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710





-----Original Message-----

From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Massey, Charles E

Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 1:28 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: EntityType - Platform - Type 26



Updated CR03529 to REV C.  Removed the UUIDs from rows 12 and 13.  I don't think these UUIDs caused problems with the ESI Tools, but they caused a bit of manual work with my enumeration sorting tool.  Recommend keeping CR03529C in Hold-Future for now.







########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:

https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:

https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2