SAC-SWG-ENUM Archives

July 2017

SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Ronnfeldt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jul 2017 21:59:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
OK, update on this.

Looking at both CR's 01897 and 01898 which both deal with the AN/ARN-135 (and I can't even find a CR form for CR01898 in source forge), and I found this post from 20 May 2015.


The toolset noted an issue with this CR:

Error: CR1897A - row 12: Cannot add Entity Specific 7.2.225.12.1.2, "AN/ARN-135" does not match description "AN/ARN-139" for predefined specific 2 [UID 24]

This error occurs because UID 24, the table for the Radio Specific field, identifies the applicability as 7.X.X.0-20.0-3.  After looking at this CR and possibly others, I question whether we want that table UID 24 at all.  I think members of the Radio Tiger Team need to weigh in on this.

Lance Marrou, Leidos / SE Core CVEM, [log in to unmask]


Any updates from the team?

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

Simulation Standards Officer
Australian Defence Simulation and Training Centre
Joint Operations Command
Annex, 10 Whyalla Street (FYD-GF-21)
PO Box 7940
Canberra BC ACT 2610 
Ph:  +61 (0)2 6266 1669
Fax: +61 (0)2 6266 1780

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2