Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:53:06 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain;charset="utf-8" |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
base64 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Did the tools need updating to process this file? If not (and I think not) then I wouldn't up the version of the template. Graham's practice has been to update the version only when the toolset needed updating.
Honestly, though, I'm okay with either. I do realize the confusion in having multiple Version 7 templates around.
Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710
-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 12:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Non CR - Blank-SimpleEnum-CR changes
Please ignore the first attachment - I did not add the new information in the correct spot - hence the dropdown did not find it.
This version works.
Regards,
David Ronnfeldt
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1
|
|
|