Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 16 Feb 2018 04:46:34 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Looks fine. Recommend CR 3798A for approval.
However, as an aside (extra credit), I was going to suggest using the acronym ATGM, but I now realize it doesn't exist in the acronym table. Perhaps add it and use it? There are a handful of other uses of ATGM.
For even more extra credit, I noticed that there are other uses of Anti-Tank Guided Missile, and not using the acronym. There are also ATGW and spelled out.
Maybe this could go into an action item...let me know.
Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710
-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 11:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: CR to add Type 96 tank
I was having a further look at this, and noticed that I had not listed the information for the version a and b tanks correctly. So.
Rev A - updated information to correctly list the difference configurations and versions.
Regards,
David Ronnfeldt
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1
|
|
|