Back to SISO Website
SISO Discussion Forums

Help for SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List


SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List

SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List


SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

SISO Discussions Home

SISO Discussions Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM  July 2017

SAC-SWG-ENUM July 2017

Subject:

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Change AN/ARN-135

From:

"Marrou, Lance R." <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:27:04 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Correction, you meant 1899, not 1898. You can't find 1898 because it has been closed and moved into the v22 change block.

I think this issue is still open, and maybe not high priority for the submitter. I will ensure it gets bubbled up to the right person, though. Maybe it was just missed.

Thus, until that happens, I'm leaving both as RW.

Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710


-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 10:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Change AN/ARN-135

OK, update on this.

Looking at both CR's 01897 and 01898 which both deal with the AN/ARN-135 (and I can't even find a CR form for CR01898 in source forge), and I found this post from 20 May 2015.


The toolset noted an issue with this CR:

Error: CR1897A - row 12: Cannot add Entity Specific 7.2.225.12.1.2, "AN/ARN-135" does not match description "AN/ARN-139" for predefined specific 2 [UID 24]

This error occurs because UID 24, the table for the Radio Specific field, identifies the applicability as 7.X.X.0-20.0-3. After looking at this CR and possibly others, I question whether we want that table UID 24 at all. I think members of the Radio Tiger Team need to weigh in on this.

Lance Marrou, Leidos / SE Core CVEM, [log in to unmask]


Any updates from the team?

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

Simulation Standards Officer
Australian Defence Simulation and Training Centre Joint Operations Command Annex, 10 Whyalla Street (FYD-GF-21) PO Box 7940 Canberra BC ACT 2610
Ph: +61 (0)2 6266 1669
Fax: +61 (0)2 6266 1780

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search SISO Discussions

Search SISO Discussions


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Discussion Forum List

July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015

ATOM RSS1 RSS2