SAC-SWG-ENUM Archives

August 2017

SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Merlet, Patrick" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:51:26 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Thanks Lance I could not recall off-hand why we did not use 3, but I was hoping there was a good reason. You are correct we have implemented 4 and 5 and would like to stick with them. 



A reminder that the Radio Tiger Team has some unfinished business. At a minimum I recall we have some recommended changes for the Beam Antenna Pattern Type but I don't remember if we put a bow on it, and we had some other things in the hopper too. 



Patrick J. Merlet

CAF DMO O&I Standards Lead

Parsons Corporation, Orlando, FL

[log in to unmask] - P: +1 407.541.313



-----Original Message-----

From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marrou, Lance R.

Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 1:04 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Add Transmitter Radiation Volume Antenna Pattern Types



As I understand it, there was a plan for an entry at (3) that never materialized and now 4 and 5 are standardized in their federation.  There's no SISO-REF-010 requirement to fill in the gaps, so to speak, so (3) can remain open.   I thus don't see a reason not to allow 3685 as-is.   The submitter can modify it if desired, but no requirement to do so.  Maybe the next antenna pattern record type can go there.



(Btw, it was going to be the Universal Dipole Antenna Pattern Record, but the DIS Radio Tiger Team decided not to pursue it at the time.)



Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]

12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710



-----Original Message-----



From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt



Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 1:18 AM



To: [log in to unmask]



Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Add Transmitter Radiation Volume Antenna Pattern Types







The only question I have regarding this CR is why did you start with the value 4?







Currently I can only find values 0 thru 2 listed (with value 2 being deprecated).







Regards,







David Ronnfeldt







########################################################################







To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:



https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__discussions.sisostds.org_index.htm-3FSUBED1-3DSAC-2DSWG-2DENUM-26A-3D1&d=CwIGaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=_2lzhXJGnG_cyHDEfTIvPFa9kvfSDaUz-evaR4-pUrk&m=B2dyFxH-2ANwufgsBqVoeA8ORvi_HuDg57trd87uz1k&s=KQnTJ4DCMlZl9u3WUGRjCRG-w8eax_8w9rV83ZdXbds&e= 







########################################################################







To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:



https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__discussions.sisostds.org_index.htm-3FSUBED1-3DSAC-2DSWG-2DENUM-26A-3D1&d=CwIGaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=_2lzhXJGnG_cyHDEfTIvPFa9kvfSDaUz-evaR4-pUrk&m=B2dyFxH-2ANwufgsBqVoeA8ORvi_HuDg57trd87uz1k&s=KQnTJ4DCMlZl9u3WUGRjCRG-w8eax_8w9rV83ZdXbds&e= 





########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:

https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2