I'm happy with using the acronym in the name and then adding the acronym to table 2 as e.g.:

ALRS  Avion Leger de Surveillance and Reconnaissance (Light Surveillance and Reconnaissance Aircraft)



We display the entity name in our simulator and those with very long names are sometimes difficult to read, so that's just my subjective opinion.





You should include a base ID to the original version of the aircraft. 

Depending on how many Beechcraft variants France may get, I would suggest updating the CR to either:

Beechcraft Model B300 (King Air 350)   1.2.71.7.4  Variation = y  Base ID 1.2.225.85.22.1.5

Beechcraft ALSR                        1.2.71.7.4.1



or:

Beechcraft ALSR                        1.2.71.7.4   Variation = y  Base ID 1.2.225.85.22.1.5





I'm unsure if this CR should be placed on OH or OF until the aircraft is completed. I'm fine with adding it now if France are already using an interim model B300.



Regards

Flemming Joergensen



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:

https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1