SAC-SWG-ENUM Archives

February 2018

SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Ronnfeldt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:35:05 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
OK, a couple of things here....

1st. This looks like a copy of CR03690, which has been approved for v25 release (see attached).

2nd. The LAV-III is not a variant of the US Stryker.... The Stryker is actually a variant of the LAV-III (so we could add a CR to add the variant flag to the Stryker if we wanted to).

3rd. There is no requirement to add specific weapon variants, but it is allowed as some simulation systems require this to identify entities fitted with weapons (ie, some system do not have the capability to "add" equipement/weapons). This would depend on the end systems/customers you are working with.

4th. If you are adding seperate entries with weapons, then you need to make sure that they match the 'real-world' configurations

Others can probably explain this better than I.

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2