Back to SISO Website
SISO Discussion Forums

Help for SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List


SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List

SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List


SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

SISO Discussions Home

SISO Discussions Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM  February 2018

SAC-SWG-ENUM February 2018

Subject:

Re: EXTERNAL: CR to update Other land vehicles

From:

David Ronnfeldt <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 23 Feb 2018 01:29:14 -0500

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (59 lines) , CR03807B - CR to update Other land vehicles.xlsx (59 lines)

Here is an updated

Rev B - to address comments on the reflector

Additional CR's have been added to update the relevant required UID's - removes the conflicts.

Removed some of the generic subcategory entries (eg bobcat, civic....)

Left the generic PLS in here - as the requirement is for the 'generic' PLS, POL and POL Sample vehicles (ie, they do not require a country of origin).

All of the listed additions are already in use in by various systems - and I am just trying to tidy up the information and get it aligned to what is listed in the SISO Enumerations (to stop the interoperability issues that are occurring)

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marrou, Lance R.
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 1:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: CR to update Other land vehicles

There are many problems with this CR.

1. Category 87 uses Construction Specialty Vehicle [UID 434] as the table. This only goes up to 39. Is there a CR that extends it to the numbers provided here?

2. There are clear conflicts between the Subcategories used here and those specified in UID 434. Look at Crane, Tracked (39) which is not Snowcat (39).

3. Bobcat is not Country code 0, it is not generic.

4. The D7G I would say is military, not civilian. There are other military bulldozers under 1.1.225.3

5. There are others that I think shouldn't be generic. Like the PLS.

6. There are others that shouldn't be country code 0, like a Civic.

Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710


-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 2:15 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: CR to update Other land vehicles

Here is a CR to update Other land vehicles (another MCL review)

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search SISO Discussions

Search SISO Discussions


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Discussion Forum List

October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015

ATOM RSS1 RSS2