SAC-SWG-ENUM Archives

February 2018

SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marrou, Lance R." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:22:27 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
CR03529 still stays on hold.


REV D - Updated to valid link.

As an aside, I know Graham said UK practice is to use Type 26, but Wiki now also references it as City-class frigate. I didn't change it, though, just fixed the link to a valid one. If there's a better UK-based link, feel free to change or add it.

Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710


-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Massey, Charles E
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 1:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: EntityType - Platform - Type 26

Updated CR03529 to REV C. Removed the UUIDs from rows 12 and 13. I don't think these UUIDs caused problems with the ESI Tools, but they caused a bit of manual work with my enumeration sorting tool. Recommend keeping CR03529C in Hold-Future for now.



########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2