SAC-SWG-ENUM Archives

April 2019

SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marrou, Lance R." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:06:00 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I don't think this is the right entity type.  The MLRS should not be a child of the SPH,  they are nothing alike even if they're both called Type 83.  I think this entity type should be a different SCAT altogether. Frankly, it would've been better to organize the SCATs by thins like "122mm SPH", "152mm SPH", "173mm MLRS", etc.


Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710


-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: CR to add Type 83 MLRS

Here is a CR to add the Multiple Launch Rocket System based off the Type 83.

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

Simulation Standards Officer
Australian Defence Simulation and Training Centre Joint Operations Command
10 Whyalla Street (FYD-01-21)
PO Box 7940
Canberra BC ACT 2610
Ph: +61 (0)2 6266 1669


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2