Back to SISO Website
SISO Discussion Forums

Help for SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List


SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List

SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List


SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

SISO Discussions Home

SISO Discussions Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM  May 2019

SAC-SWG-ENUM May 2019

Subject:

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: CR proposal for ballistic missile changes

From:

"Marrou, Lance R." <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 8 May 2019 15:08:03 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Need some discussion perhaps on some points and needs an actual proposal. The text in the definition of change section is certainly not appropriate for the OPMAN or SISO-REF-010. As I understand it, what is being asked is that we create a process for handling ballistic missile (BM) enumerations that will require that they be submitted to the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). All of the comments about master class list (MCL) aren't useful because unless they make the MCL public, any references to it won't be made in our documentation. Also, no references will be made to either SIPRnet or NIPRnet, as members will never be expected to use those.

One of the foundational concepts here is that when a SISO member wants an enumeration, that member is only concerned about public information. U.S. national agencies (and their contractors) can certainly follow the MDA process, but no one outside that group can, and there are many. The MDA needs to be ready to handle requests from anyone in the world, without restriction.

If that concept is unpalatable, then perhaps it can be modified somewhat such that a member instead starts with the last step in Fig 2 (as normal for enumerations) and instead, a reviewer who is more suitable for liaison with the MDA coordinate the enumerations by following the rest of the process. The requirement that the enumerations group NOT change any BM enumerations without working with the MDA is probably the main point here, though, and can still be followed. This means, the CR request is submitted to SISO, a liaison brings it to the MDA following Fig 2, and then coordinates changes (if any) back to SISO, including the "approval" of the enumerations from the MDA.

The other possible problem I see is that as of now, we don't know if the MCL is baselined against a SISO-REF-010 version. If not, then there could be significant conflicts and resolving those will be problematic. It will not be as easy as just changing SISO enumerations if they have been there for 25+ years. What I hope to see happen, here, though, is that the MDA is willing to work with SISO (or some subset of members like perhaps myself and David) to get a consolidated baseline of BM enumerations between the MCL and SISO-REF-010 v26. I don't know what we will find, but the idea is to work through the issues (if any).

Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710


-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 11:56 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: CR proposal for ballistic missile changes

I don't have a problem with this proposal. It proposes a change on how ballistic missile's would be reviewed.

It would require an update to the OPMAN to add this information, and I would like to add a toolset addition that would include a check to ensure the steps have been followed prior to proceeding.

I would appreciate other feedback before I recommend this for approval.

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search SISO Discussions

Search SISO Discussions


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Discussion Forum List

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015

ATOM RSS1 RSS2