Back to SISO Website
SISO Discussion Forums

Help for SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List


SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List

SAC-SWG-ENUM Discussion Forum List


SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

SISO Discussions Home

SISO Discussions Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM Home

SAC-SWG-ENUM  May 2019

SAC-SWG-ENUM May 2019

Subject:

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: 10th v27 current draft release

From:

"WEISS, STEVEN W CTR USAF ACC 705 CTS/C2T" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 16 May 2019 14:56:05 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

As long as we can get the new UIDs assigned to reference in the standards, I don't really care if the CRs are approved or on hold.

R/
Steve

Steven Weiss
Senior Analyst
C2TSC/RiverTech
USAF Distributed Mission Operations Center (DMOC)
(505) 853-0998; DSN 263


-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Marrou, Lance R.
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 7:06 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: EXTERNAL: Re: 10th v27 current draft release

4008 is on hold, and I removed the CR dependency. The dependency was already released in v26. (Side note, I also did the same thing for 4009, an unrelated CR.)

4125 is still approved. What you suggest is a good idea and is generally the approach we want to take. Don't approve CRs in the enumerations document until those things are essentially final. But, frankly, it's up to the (external) group. The enumerations process and document we have is fairly robust and agile and can handle a submission and some rework, though that rework would be visible if already released. For example, v27 is planned for fall, say late October. If that timing for a release is "okay enough" for UID 800, then you could certainly leave it as approved. Because this CR was approved, I'm leaving it as such while you guys have a bit of time to think about whether you want it on hold or not.

Note: you also need to consider CR3998. These are all the Link 11/11B parameters and that CR is approved right now.

Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710


-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Rene Verhage
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 5:27 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: 10th v27 current draft release

As per the request from Steve Weiss on 29 Oct 2018 (https://usg01.safelinks.protection.office365.us/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscussions.sisostds.org%2Findex.htm%3FA2%3Dind1810%26L%3DSAC-SWG-ENUM%26O%3DD%26F%3DP%26X%3D7F1093BA9704BEBEC7%26Y%3Drene.verhage%2540cae.com%26P%3D51728&amp;data=02%7C01%7Csteven.weiss.3.ctr%40us.af.mil%7C1d4c94b0339649b5beca08d6da0059c9%7C8331b18d2d8748efa35fac8818ebf9b4%7C1%7C0%7C636936092427651025&amp;sdata=7%2BPV5M7hX3x7hw7vuBti%2B7hFzs0GGPDvi5G10bXKP%2FM%3D&amp;reserved=0), please put CR 4008 on hold until the new SISO-STD-002 version is published.

It might also be wise to put CR 4125 on hold until after SISO-STD-002 publication, as it is used for a new field and ballot comments could lead to changes.
Or, what is the best order? Having enumerations and enumerators in an official SISO-REF-010 publication before or after the official publication of the standard in which they are used? Or is there a sweet spot in between balloting, comment resolution, and publication of the standard?

René Verhage

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://usg01.safelinks.protection.office365.us/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscussions.sisostds.org%2Findex.htm%3FSUBED1%3DSAC-SWG-ENUM%26A%3D1&amp;data=02%7C01%7Csteven.weiss.3.ctr%40us.af.mil%7C1d4c94b0339649b5beca08d6da0059c9%7C8331b18d2d8748efa35fac8818ebf9b4%7C1%7C0%7C636936092427651025&amp;sdata=OvL520C0oXxvqQDwtf%2FU1mGpCdfJ%2FCXqMh0VDLfV3gk%3D&amp;reserved=0

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://usg01.safelinks.protection.office365.us/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscussions.sisostds.org%2Findex.htm%3FSUBED1%3DSAC-SWG-ENUM%26A%3D1&amp;data=02%7C01%7Csteven.weiss.3.ctr%40us.af.mil%7C1d4c94b0339649b5beca08d6da0059c9%7C8331b18d2d8748efa35fac8818ebf9b4%7C1%7C0%7C636936092427651025&amp;sdata=OvL520C0oXxvqQDwtf%2FU1mGpCdfJ%2FCXqMh0VDLfV3gk%3D&amp;reserved=0

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search SISO Discussions

Search SISO Discussions


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Discussion Forum List

April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015

ATOM RSS1 RSS2