SAC-SWG-ENUM Archives

May 2019

SAC-SWG-ENUM@DISCUSSIONS.SISOSTDS.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rene Verhage <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SAC-SWG-ENUM <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 May 2019 05:26:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
As per the request from Steve Weiss on 29 Oct 2018 (https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?A2=ind1810&L=SAC-SWG-ENUM&O=D&F=P&X=7F1093BA9704BEBEC7&Y=rene.verhage%40cae.com&P=51728), please put CR 4008 on hold until the new SISO-STD-002 version is published. 

It might also be wise to put CR 4125 on hold until after SISO-STD-002 publication, as it is used for a new field and ballot comments could lead to changes.
Or, what is the best order? Having enumerations and enumerators in an official SISO-REF-010 publication before or after the official publication of the standard in which they are used? Or is there a sweet spot in between balloting, comment resolution, and publication of the standard?

René Verhage

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2