Maybe I misunderstood the intent of the second sentence of the paragraph.
It implies that such a minor editorial change will be made in a
supplement...rather than in the standard itself.

KLM
-----------------------------------
Katherine L. Morse, Ph.D.
DMSO SETA Support
Chief Scientist, AVP Technology
SAIC
10260 Campus Point Drive, MS A1, San Diego, CA 92121
(858)826-6728; (858)826-2084 (fax); (858)775-8651 (cell)



From: "James McCall" ([log in to unmask])

*** This message was generated from SISO-SAC ***

Re DLC API change: I believe the issue here was that the change had been
approved and the editor failed to incorporate the change in the version sent
to the SAC. There is also the issue that this is a technical change that is
required for correct execution rather than a minor editorial change.

Mark McCall (Anteon Corp.)
Warfighter Readiness Research Division
Air Force Research Laboratory
6030 S. Kent St. Bldg 561
Mesa, AZ 85212

(480) 988-6561 x231
DSN 474-6231

Caution: This message may contain competitive, sensitive or other non-public
information not intended for disclosure outside official government
channels. Do not disseminate this message without the approval of the
undersigned's office. If you received this message in error, please notify
the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

-----Original Message-----
From: SISO-SAC: Katherine Morse
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Draft BPDSP for SAC Review



wbquoteFrom: "Katherine Morse" ([log in to unmask]
)

*** This message was generated from SISO-SAC ***

* Section 4.2.4.1: "The PDG shall approve, by vote, membership of the
new members with all voting rights prior to conducting business." This
sounds like the PDG can prevent new members from joining. I don't think
that's what you meant. "The PDG may convey, by vote, immediate voting
rights to new members prior to conducting business."

* Shouldn't section 4.4.12 have a "shall" in it some place?

* 4.5.4.1 should be "PSG Kickoff Meeting."

* 4.5.10 says, "SISO balloted products are not subject to making minor
changes outside the product revision process. Minor typographical or
editorial changes may be included in a balloted supplement to a SISO
product." But aren't we in the process of doing just this for the DLC API?

* PSG isn't in the glossary.

* I also found a handful of editorial issues, but I'll save those
until we get the substantive stuff out of the way.




KLM
-----------------------------------
Katherine L. Morse, Ph.D.
DMSO SETA Support
Chief Scientist, AVP Technology
SAIC
10260 Campus Point Drive, MS A1, San Diego, CA 92121
(858)826-6728; (858)826-2084 (fax); (858)775-8651 (cell)



From: "James McCall" ([log in to unmask])

*** This message was generated from SISO-SAC ***

SAC Lurkers,

As you are aware, Katherine, Peggy, and myself have been working on a
revision of the BPDP, called the Ballotted Products Development and Support
Process, primarily to add the Product Support Group concept, but also to
clear up some of the guidance that we have for the PDGs. We have also
attempted to fix some of the issues that various PDGs have identified over
the last couple of years.

The attached is the most current draft of the BPDSP. We are still working
on the templates for Appendix D and will be adding these in the near future.
We would like for you to conduct one final review of the draft prior to it's
being posted for full SISO review.

Since most of the changes have been discussed piecemeal and since an earlier
version of the document has been available on the private reflector, I am
going to ask each of you to make an effort to review this and be prepared to
make a decision on 2 May for the document to be posted for SISO review by 3
May. This would allow for final revisions and a SAC approval vote on 6 June
followed by EXCOM approval in Jun or Jul.

Thank you for your support.



Mark

-- Attachment: SISO-ADM-003-2006Draft20Apr.doc

To reply:[log in to unmask]
Review> for SAC Review>
To start a new topic:[log in to unmask]
To view discussion:
http://discussions.sisostds.org/default.asp?boardid=2=9@0081




id1>

id1>
To (un)subscribe:[log in to unmask] with the
word unsubscribe in the message body.

SISO: http://www.sisostds.org/





To reply:[log in to unmask]

20for%20SAC%20Review>
To start a new topic:[log in to unmask]

To view discussion: http://discussions.sisostds.org/default.asp?boardid=2


id1> =9@0081
To (un)subscribe:[log in to unmask]
with the word
unsubscribe in the message body.

SISO: http://www.sisostds.org/

wbendquote


To reply:[log in to unmask]
SAC Review> Draft BPDSP for SAC Review>
To start a new topic:[log in to unmask]
To view discussion:
http://discussions.sisostds.org/default.asp?boardid=2=9@0081

id1>
id1>
To (un)subscribe:[log in to unmask] with the
word unsubscribe in the message body.

SISO: http://www.sisostds.org/







To unsubscribe from the SISO-SAC list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SISO-SAC