We can and should have UCF there to answer questions, make
sure people are properly signed up, etc. However, the
collection of funds will have to be done at the registration
desk, both for integration of receipts, and also for the
practical reason that UCF is not permitted to collect fees
directly.

Duke


At 10:04 AM -0400 8/5/09, SISO-EXCOM: Katherine Morse wrote:
>From: "Katherine Morse"
>([log in to unmask])
>
>*** This message was generated from SISO-EXCOM ***
>
>Well then, the UCF proposal should include staffing this manual
>process at úll SIW registration. It may have to be done "off to
>the side" rather tha=n integrated with the existing registration
>process.
>
>KLM
>---
>Katherine L. Morse, PhD
>Senior Professional Staff
>JHU/APL
>11100 Johns Hopkins Road
>Laurel, MD 20723-6099
>(858)678-0629 (w)
>(858)775-8651 (m)
>________________________________________
>From: SISO-EXCOM: Duncan Miller
>[[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 6:10 PM
>Subject: Re: CEU Proposal for EXCOM and BOD Review
>
>From: "Duncan Miller" ([log in to unmask])
>
>*** This message was generated from SISO-EXCOM ***
>
>All,
>
>A comment or two re the mechanics. I've listened to the
>discussions of this, but I apparently missed the part about
>adding options to the registration website. It is kind of
>late to do that. The website set up by IMCM was approved
>at least three months ago, and has been in operation for
>almost that long. It may not be practical to change it at
>this point, so we would probably have to collect some
>additional fees at the registration desk from people who
>have already completed their on-line registration, which
>will slow down registration check-ins. From this
>perspective, it might be better to wait and publicize this
>program better and implement it in the spring, at which
>point it can be integrated into the web registration
>process from the start.
>
>That also raises another question in my mind: since we
>are co-locating with SCS in the spring, should we make
>this a joint operation, open to both SISO and SCS registrants?
>In either case, we're going to need to coordinate it with
>SCS.
>
>Duke
>
>At 5:03 PM -0400 8/4/09, SISO-EXCOM: Katherine Morse wrote:
>>From: "Katherine Morse"
>>([log in to unmask])
>>
>>*** This message was generated from SISO-EXCOM ***
>>
>>I think this is a great idea, but with the Fall SIW in just 7 weeks,
>>we'd better get moving. I recommend that we immediately request a
>>cost proposal from UCF.
>>
>>KLM
>>---
>>Katherine L. Morse, PhD
>>Senior Professional Staff
>>JHU/APL
>>11100 Johns Hopkins Road
>>Laurel, MD 20723-6099
>>(858)678-0629 (w)
>>(858)775-8651 (m)
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>From: "SISO-EXCOM: Ralph Weber"
>>([log in to unmask])
>>Reply-To: SISO-EXCOM
>>([log in to unmask])
>>Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:23:32 -0400
>>Subject: FW: CEU Proposal for EXCOM and BOD Review
>>
>>From: "Ralph Weber" ([log in to unmask])
>>
>>*** This message was generated from SISO-EXCOM ***
>>
>>All,
>>
>>
>>
>>The attached proposal of the CC will be discussed at the 10 Aug telecon.
>>Please review and be prepared to discuss.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Ralph
>>
>>
>>
>>Ralph Weber
>>
>>Chair, Executive Committee
>>
>>256-964-4549
>>
>>256-520-7133 Cell
>>
>>http://www.sisostds.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>From: Sarah N. Trbovich [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 1:48 AM
>>To: Weber, Ralph
>>Cc: Van Lowe; Duke Miller
>>Subject: CEU Proposal for EXCOM and BOD Review
>>
>>
>>
>>Ralph -
>>
>>On the 31 July telecon, the CC approved the attached CEU Proposal. The
>>CC would like to put this forth to the EXCOM and BOD for review and
>>approval. Is this something that is done concurrently or first the EXCOM
>>then the BOD?
>>
>>VR,
>>Sarah
>>
>>--
>>Ms. Sarah Trbovich
>>Cutlass Systems Engineering LLC | [log in to unmask] |
>>+1.301.219.2733
>>
>>
>>-- Attachment: SISO-SIW_CEU_Proposal_v2(1).doc
> >
>>To reply: [log in to unmask]
>>To start a new topic: [log in to unmask]
>>To view discussion:
>>http://discussions.sisostds.org/default.asp?boardid=2&action=9&read=F351&fid3
>>
>>To (un)subscribe: Send a message to
>>[log in to unmask] with the word
>>unsubscribe in the message body.
>>Important: the unsubscribe email needs to be in plain text format,
>>and needs to have no subject line.
>>
>>SISO: http://www.sisostds.org/
>>
>>To reply:
>> >Proposal for EXCOM and BOD
>>Review>[log in to unmask]
>>To start a new topic:
>>[log in to unmask]
>>To view discussion:
>>http://discussions.sisostds.org/default.asp?boardid=2&action=9&read=F351&fid3
>>
>>To (un)subscribe: Send a message to
>>[log in to unmask]
>>with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>>Important: the unsubscribe email needs to be in plain text format,
>>and needs to have no subject line.
>>
>>SISO: http://www.sisostds.org/
>
>To reply: [log in to unmask]
>To start a new topic: [log in to unmask]
>To view discussion:
>http://discussions.sisostds.org/default.asp?boardid=2=&action=9&readF351&fid3
>
>To (un)subscribe: Send a message to
>[log in to unmask] with the= word
>unsubscribe in the message body.
>Important: the unsubscribe email needs to be in plain text format,
>and need=s to have no subject line.
>
>SISO: http://www.sisostds.org/
>
>To reply:
> >Proposal for EXCOM and BOD
>Review>[log in to unmask]
>To start a new topic:
>[log in to unmask]
>To view discussion:
>http://discussions.sisostds.org/default.asp?boardid=2&action=9&readF351&fid3
>
>To (un)subscribe: Send a message to
>[log in to unmask]
>with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>Important: the unsubscribe email needs to be in plain text format,
>and needs to have no subject line.
>
>SISO: http://www.sisostds.org/


To unsubscribe from the SISO-EXCOM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SISO-EXCOM