Format for GRIM issues looks OK to me.
I have a question - not sure if this should be recorded as an issue or not.
The GRIM refers to the DIS EBV in a number of places, but I am not sure if this is the right thing to do since the enumerations tend to be defined within the FOM itself.
Should there be a statement at the front of the GRIM which defines which EBV issue RPR-FOMV2 will match and then provide guidance on the adoption of newer EBV values?
To unsubscribe from the SAC-PDG-RPR list, click the following link: