Print

Print


Please find attached the completed comparison between the current RPR FOM v2 draft 19 and the NETN RPR2 modules, up to the level of classes and attributes.

As the recent post from Roger Jansen (http://discussions.sisostds.org/threadview.aspx?fid%9&threadidR755) made clear, this needs to be extended into comparing the data type definitions.

Also the discussion points I raised earlier in this thread are still open.


 



To unsubscribe from the SAC-PDG-RPR list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-PDG-RPR