I still don’t know if we are having a meeting tomorrow, Thursday, 1 Nov at 1000 AM EST or not.
From: "Rene Verhage" ([log in to unmask])
*** This message was generated from SAC-PDG-RPR ***
Please find attached the completed comparison between the current RPR FOM v2 draft 19 and the NETN RPR2 modules, up to the level of classes and attributes.
As the recent post from Roger Jansen (http://discussions.sisostds.org/threadview.aspx?fid%9&threadidR755) made clear, this needs to be extended into comparing the data type definitions.
Also the discussion points I raised earlier in this thread are still open.
-- Attachment: Change tracking - current RPR v2 - RPR v2d17 OMT(1).xlsx Change tracking - current RPR v2 - RPR v2d17 OMT(1).pdf
To reply: [log in to unmask]
To start a new topic: [log in to unmask]
To view discussion: http://discussions.sisostds.org/threadview.aspx?fid%9&threadidR709#81219
To (un)subscribe: Send a message to [log in to unmask] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Important: the unsubscribe email needs to be in plain text format, and needs to have no subject line.
To unsubscribe from the SAC-PDG-RPR list, click the following link: