Frank, I apologize, you are correct. I was confusing the interactions and object classes, and I realized just a few minutes after sending that. I was thinking of the interactions, not the transmitter object class. Our version of RPR 2 does not even attempt to add any new signal interaction classes as specified in SISO-STD-002. It only accounts for the addition to the RadioTransmitter object class. So ignore everything I just posted.
However, this does bring up another point. The current implementation only includes the updates to RadioTransmitter. If we are going that far, why aren't we including the additional radio signal classes?
To unsubscribe from the SAC-PDG-RPR list, click the following link: