David,

To avoid issues with the release (there is a step which checks that the version of an approved CR in the CR Status file is the latest revision in subversion) you need to do one of two things:

1. Submit a rev C backing out the rev B changes (i.e. re-submit rev A as rev C)
2. Get somebody with subversion commit privileges to delete the rev B file from subversion.

Although normally we would automatically approve a submitter withdrawing revision if they made a mistake, in this case (you not being the original submitter and proposing a non-trivial change) I suggest discussing this at an SWG meeting to get approval.

Regards,
Graham
Technical Manager – Synthetic Environments
BAE Systems – Defence Information


Please note new landline number
T: +44(0)3300 470622  |  M: +44(0)779 342 2007    |  E: [log in to unmask]
BAE Sytems Defence Information
North Way, Hillend Industrial Park, Dalgety Bay, Fife KY11 9HQ, UK
_____________________________________________
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales, Registration No: 01996687
www.baesystems.com


-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt
Sent: 21 August 2017 00:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CR03572 - Update Life Form Subcategory Equipment - v23 d05 issue fix

----------------------! WARNING ! ---------------------- This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an external partner or from the internet.
Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any attachments or reply.
Follow the 'Report Suspicious Emails' link on IT matters for instructions on reporting suspicious email messages.
--------------------------------------------------------

Apologies for this, but I would like to withdraw the Rev B update.

On further review of this, I looks like the original plan for UID 473, was to use this table to reflect the equipment used by humans.

So the original footnote for 1 - Weapon, Non-specific "Subcategories 1-149 are restricted to weapon classes"  would have been correct.

At a later date, additional specific classes were x-referenced to UID 473, to allow for expanded entries. (eg look at Assault Rifles UID 474)

So now that we have a specific table for Weapons, Non-specific (being UID 514), the footnote is no longer relevant, and should be removed (which is what I did by mistake in Rev A).

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1