Print

Print


The renaming of UID 80 should not cause any confusion with DIS users (at least not v7 users) since the IEEE 1278.1-2012 explicitly references [UID 80] for the Code Name field in the Designator PDU. The standard does not refer to the heading name in SISO-REF-010 directly.

In fact, if we don't keep using UID 80 then we will break any interoperability between v6/v7 and any future versions of the DIS standard.

The meaning of the field in DIS isn't changing, just its name. There are plenty of other places in DIS where we've changed the names of fields. There is a direct mapping between the DIS fields in v6/v7 and (the proposed) v8. We want them to use the same values.

Regards,
Graham
Technical Manager – Synthetic Environments
BAE Systems – Air


Please note new landline number
T: +44(0)3300 470622  |  M: +44(0)779 342 2007    |  E: [log in to unmask]
BAE Sytems Defence Information
North Way, Hillend Industrial Park, Dalgety Bay, Fife KY11 9HQ, UK
_____________________________________________
BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales, Registration No: 01996687
www.baesystems.com

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1