Some comments for discussion:


·         The MOWAG and Piranha V are in the Armored Utility Vehicle Category (3), not Armored Fighting Vehicle (2).  So, maybe take a look at this with respect to the Bison.

·         Also, maybe we could “clean up” some of these same vehicle families.  I don’t think the proper initial enumeration was done and now they’re getting kind of messy (multiple countries, not the same structure, etc.).  I care less that they’re multiple countries and more that if essentially the same vehicle is represented in multiple countries, at least we’re using the same Category.  The M113A2 is in Category 2, so I think that one’s probably okay.  But, as a counterpoint, look at AUS fitter vehicles.

·         Should the RG-31 be a variant off the SA one?

·         I would put the RWS acronym after the words.  I know this was copied from Wikipedia like that, but Wikipedia is wrong, too (it did it this way because of the link).

Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710



-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 4:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: CR to add Canadian Land Vehicles



I am doing a review of the MCL, and have found the following Canadian land vehicles that are listed in the MCL that should be listed in the Enumerations list.



Regards,



David Ronnfeldt



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:

https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1