UNCLASSIFIED

Lance,

 

The problem with trying to deprecate any entry with a value of 'zero' is embedded into the toolset (and as of yet I am unable to find where it originates).

 

As this does not occur very often at all (in fact we should update the OPMAN to say that no entry can be added at 'zero' anyway),  I would like to leave the deprecation of 'zero' value entries as manual for now.

 

As for Deprecating an entire UID - this is also very difficult.  I tried to do this manually in many different ways, and each time the toolset would not except it.  In the end I went with deprecating the value, and then adding a text note.  The end result is (from the latest v25 Current DRAFT):

 

/index.htm?A3=ind1802&L=SAC-SWG-ENUM&E=base64&P=8064784&B=--_004_60611F07ABD4514A932D0E94F67EC3B316DDA56DSIEPD85EXP0534d_&T=image%2Fjpeg;%20name=%22image001.jpg%22&N=image001.jpg

 

Which I think would suit what we are trying to achieve.

 

Thoughts?

 

Regards,

 

David Ronnfeldt

 

Simulation Standards Officer

Australian Defence Simulation and Training Centre

Joint Operations Command

Annex, 10 Whyalla Street (FYD-GF-21)

PO Box 7940

Canberra BC ACT 2610

Ph:   +61 (0)2 6266 1669

Fax: +61 (0)2 6266 1780

 

-----Original Message-----
From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marrou, Lance R.
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2018 2:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Deprecate UID 81 Information

 

I would think it couldn't run because you can't (couldn't?) update an enumeration at the same time you deprecate it.  For sure, this wouldn't work in the past and although you said you had altered that capability, maybe not in all cases.  Thus, if you changed the other Excel CR to first add the footnote and then deprecate (two separate lines in the same CR, yes you can do this), maybe it would work.

 

However, I think this CR is wrong.  I don't think the one enumeration itself should be deprecated.  I think the entire Table should be deprecated.  This does require a manual CR, so would suggest revving this to B and instead deprecate the table for UID 81.

 

Lance Marrou, Leidos, [log in to unmask]

12901 Science Drive, Orlando, Florida USA 32826, o: 407.243.3710

 

-----Original Message-----

From: SAC-SWG-ENUM [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Ronnfeldt

Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 12:27 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Deprecate UID 81 Information

 

The toolset would not run on the original excel CR, and requires a manual CR

 

This update changes the CR to a manual update.

 

Rev A - change CR to a manual update.

 

Regards,

 

David Ronnfeldt

 

########################################################################

 

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:

https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

 

########################################################################

 

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:

https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.



To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1