Print

Print


Thank you for the explaination Lance (and the reference to the foal, how did you know that I liked horses).

With a quick search of the enumerations, I have found the following versions of naming:

1.3.13.11.1.1        L 126 Balikpapan (transferred - use 1.3.173.11.1.3 instead)
1.3.173.11.1.3      290 Agta (ex L 126 Balikpapan)

1.3.224.6.2.1        F 88 Broadsword (transferred - use 1.3.29.6.2.1 instead)
1.3.29.6.2.1          F 46 Greenhalgh (ex-Broadsword)

1.3.222.1.4.1        Admiral Gorshkov (transferred - use 1.3.99.1.1.1 instead)
1.3.99.1.1.1          Vikramaditya


My prefference would be the first format (so include the pendant and name preceded by ex).  This may allow for users to more easily identify the original ships if they need to (eg - if they already have the model for the original ship, they would be able to 'update' that model instead of starting from scratch).

Regards,

David Ronnfeldt

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-SWG-ENUM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-SWG-ENUM&A=1