What is the requirement for defining compliance in the standard? Is this
supposed to be a test or suite of tests?
Is there an example in another SISO standard?

Mark, I don't understand what "implementing" a class means here. If one
writes a piece of code with a definition of a class called Actor, is that
implementing the class?

Doug Reece

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:06 PM Mark Pullen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The C2SIM standard needs to include a definition of compliance.
>
> Some ideas that have been put forward include (1) require all Core data
> classes to be implemented (2) choose mandatory classes and include for them
> an ontology property "mustBeImplemented" (3) require that compliant systems
> are able to receive Core classes without exception, but not that the
> systems be able to use that data.
>
> If you like any of these or have another idea to recommend, please respond
> to this email.
>
> Mark
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM list, click the following link:
> https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM&A=1
>


-- 

*Dr. Douglas Reece* |  Principal Engineer
*VT MÄK  | *150 Cambridge Park Drive, Third Floor, Cambridge, MA 02140
T: +1.857.209.3483  |
[log in to unmask]  |  www.mak.com

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=SAC-PDG-PSG-C2SIM&A=1