Print

Print


Re: Fwd: RPR FOM Object ID Keith Briggs <a href="/index.htm?LOGON=A3%3Dind9806%26L%3DZ-ARCHIVE-SIW-CFI%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D22910%26B%3D--%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DUTF-8%26XSS%3D3%26header%3D1" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a> <a href="/index.htm?LOGON=A3%3Dind9806%26L%3DZ-ARCHIVE-SIW-CFI%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D22910%26B%3D--%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DUTF-8%26XSS%3D3%26header%3D1" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a>
Message from Jeff Fischer sent 6/30/98 6:35 AM.

>but it is not an inconsistency between the IF Spec
>and the RTI

Jeff,

You are of course correct.  I was focused on the discovery service and 
differences between the implementation and the spec and I extrapolated 
incorrectly from there.  Also, I think the two sentences referring to the 
RTI's assignment of names could be clearer.  I would expect that these 
two changes in the specification during the next review cycle will bring 
the implementation and the specification in line once again.

Keith





To unsubscribe from the Z-ARCHIVE-SIW-CFI list, click the following link:
https://discussions.sisostds.org/index.htm?SUBED1=Z-ARCHIVE-SIW-CFI